|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Aug 18, 2024 6:14:08 GMT
When running Intention Repeater MAX, set frequency to 3.
This will run at 3Hz.
I have found this is the strongest value to run it at.
It gives time between each iteration to rest and expand.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Aug 18, 2024 21:59:14 GMT
This Python code is stronger than the Intention Repeater MAX and CUDA, especially when run at lower frequencies like 3Hz.
It does Intention Multiplying and Frequency both, where the MAX and CUDA do not do both at the same time. Intention Multiplying is taking an intention such as "I am Love." and repeating it till it is a 10MB string.
I won't be adding the ability to do Frequency and Multiplying at the same time to MAX because as the frequency gets larger (like 1kHz+) the actual running frequency is off (like 780Hz instead of 1kHz). CUDA does not do Frequency in the first place.
But for low frequencies like 3Hz it is relatively accurate.
This code allows for choosing two optional files, whether you want hashing, and the frequency.
If you choose 0 for the frequency, it will run at max speed, which can be 6 MHz+.
Runtime 0 means it runs forever until you stop it. The number is # of seconds to run for.
It allocates only 10MB of RAM. Much more than that takes longer to load into memory.
To run the code, you can open a terminal/command prompt and run below (You can specify files to include if you wish):
python intention_repeater.py --intent "INTENTION" --file none --file2 none --freq 7.83 --hash y --runtime 0 --log none
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Aug 18, 2024 22:10:26 GMT
The intention_repeater.py is even more powerful if you screen record with OBS studio and play back several copies of the video at the same time. I imagine the CPU used by playing the video is probably not much more than running the code at 3Hz or such. You can even run at 7.83Hz and be fairly close to that as the Schumann Resonance.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Aug 24, 2024 5:55:46 GMT
I found this variant of Intention Repeater Python, where I hash each iteration, is more powerful than regular assignment.
So something like: intention = get_sha256_hash(intention)
is stronger than process_intention = intention
This program feels about 3X stronger than intention_repeater.py
But will have to play around with it.
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Aug 24, 2024 6:28:22 GMT
The intention_repeater.py is even more powerful if you screen record with OBS studio and play back several copies of the video at the same time. I imagine the CPU used by playing the video is probably not much more than running the code at 3Hz or such. You can even run at 7.83Hz and be fairly close to that as the Schumann Resonance.
7.83 Hz feels 2x stronger than 3 Hz. And then we have the "Hash-per-iteration" new method on the post above mine which is still stronger. |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Aug 24, 2024 6:48:33 GMT
As the Python Repeater Hash runs, I feel the energy building smoothly. It doesn't jump around because of how hashes change so much. So it does seem to be a focusing of energy as reden had said before. |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Aug 24, 2024 7:13:31 GMT
This hashes at 780,000 hashes per second. It feels stronger than the intention_repeater_hash.py
MAX frequency is stronger than 7.83Hz in this.
Interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by meteagle on Sept 10, 2024 21:37:05 GMT
Hi , i guess if u focus ur energy and ur time to upgrade and power up the servitor itself, it will be way more efficient and effective.
With intention repeater cuda and a relatively strong gpu ( 3070 in my case ) we have reached to the maximum capacity of what servitor can deliver for us
With all love and respect for u and the servitor , for u have helped me to experience good moments using servitor to charge myself with my goals and affirmations and some subliminals and morphic field , i guess the servitor can be and needs to be upgraded and strengthened
Whatever u do with coding , the “ feeling “ of energy may improve but the essence of energy that servitor provides is “ shallow “ and doesn’t penetrate deep and doesn’t make profound change
Again i appreciate u for all the time and energy u r putting to make a positive value in ur life and in ours i thought it’s better to share my idea to may be direct ur time and energy to a more efficient and more effective subject , even it might be possible that serviter is calling u through my comment and asks for more attention and appreciation and energy
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Sept 10, 2024 21:39:21 GMT
Hi , i guess if u focus ur energy and ur time to upgrade and power up the servitor itself, it will be way more efficient and effective. With intention repeater cuda and a relatively strong gpu ( 3070 in my case ) we have reached to the maximum capacity of what servitor can deliver for us With all love and respect for u and the servitor , for u have helped me to experience good moments using servitor to charge myself with my goals and affirmations and some subliminals and morphic field , i guess the servitor can be and needs to be upgraded and strengthened Whatever u do with coding , the “ feeling “ of energy may improve but the essence of energy that servitor provides is “ shallow “ and doesn’t penetrate deep and doesn’t make profound change Again i appreciate u for all the time and energy u r putting to make a positive value in ur life and in ours i thought it’s better to share my idea to may be direct ur time and energy to a more efficient and more effective subject , even it might be possible that serviter is calling u through my comment and asks for more attention and appreciation and energy Thank you.
I found that running Android at 7.83 or 3 Hz is stronger than even CUDA at full speed. There is no real need to run CUDA when the slower speeds are more powerful. They give time to rest in between each repetition, allowing for expansion of the energy. Not just contracting the energy all the time.
You can also run MAX with a frequency setting of 3 or 7.83. Though I don't remember if MAX does decimals for frequency. I believe CUDA doesn't have a frequency option.
But Repeater MAX won't let you multiply the intention out to 10-25MB in size while doing frequency. Android is the strongest one.
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Sept 11, 2024 0:34:03 GMT
Hi , i guess if u focus ur energy and ur time to upgrade and power up the servitor itself, it will be way more efficient and effective. With intention repeater cuda and a relatively strong gpu ( 3070 in my case ) we have reached to the maximum capacity of what servitor can deliver for us With all love and respect for u and the servitor , for u have helped me to experience good moments using servitor to charge myself with my goals and affirmations and some subliminals and morphic field , i guess the servitor can be and needs to be upgraded and strengthened Whatever u do with coding , the “ feeling “ of energy may improve but the essence of energy that servitor provides is “ shallow “ and doesn’t penetrate deep and doesn’t make profound change Again i appreciate u for all the time and energy u r putting to make a positive value in ur life and in ours i thought it’s better to share my idea to may be direct ur time and energy to a more efficient and more effective subject , even it might be possible that serviter is calling u through my comment and asks for more attention and appreciation and energy Thank you.
I found that running Android at 7.83 or 3 Hz is stronger than even CUDA at full speed. There is no real need to run CUDA when the slower speeds are more powerful. They give time to rest in between each repetition, allowing for expansion of the energy. Not just contracting the energy all the time.
You can also run MAX with a frequency setting of 3 or 7.83. Though I don't remember if MAX does decimals for frequency. I believe CUDA doesn't have a frequency option.
But Repeater MAX won't let you multiply the intention out to 10-25MB in size while doing frequency. Android is the strongest one.
Hashing every iteration we've found makes the energy thicker. MAX without it feels thin. There's a Hashing MAX nowadays which is better than normal MAX. |
|
|
|
Post by meteagle on Sept 12, 2024 20:36:03 GMT
Thank you.
I found that running Android at 7.83 or 3 Hz is stronger than even CUDA at full speed. There is no real need to run CUDA when the slower speeds are more powerful. They give time to rest in between each repetition, allowing for expansion of the energy. Not just contracting the energy all the time.
You can also run MAX with a frequency setting of 3 or 7.83. Though I don't remember if MAX does decimals for frequency. I believe CUDA doesn't have a frequency option.
But Repeater MAX won't let you multiply the intention out to 10-25MB in size while doing frequency. Android is the strongest one.
Hashing every iteration we've found makes the energy thicker. MAX without it feels thin. There's a Hashing MAX nowadays which is better than normal MAX. Hashing Max ? its a seperate app ? |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Sept 12, 2024 20:40:18 GMT
Hashing every iteration we've found makes the energy thicker. MAX without it feels thin. There's a Hashing MAX nowadays which is better than normal MAX. Hashing Max ? its a seperate app ?
|
|
