|
|
Post by nathanmyersc on Apr 29, 2024 1:16:17 GMT
Take other creators morphic fields subliminals even rife frequencies. and convert them to wav. then change the sample rate of that file to as high as possible for whatever application you use. my radionics software caps at 1764000 on my computer. But it turns a 20 minute rife frequency into a 30 second clip not losing any of the data just iterating it much faster. and i still feel the effecfts of the frequency. kind of interesting. My browser can only handle 767500 Sample rate though. My phone can handle 999999 Sample Rate.
But increasing the sample rate makes the audio more effective in my experience.
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Apr 29, 2024 1:22:19 GMT
Take other creators morphic fields subliminals even rife frequencies. and convert them to wav. then change the sample rate of that file to as high as possible for whatever application you use. my radionics software caps at 1764000 on my computer. But it turns a 20 minute rife frequency into a 30 second clip not losing any of the data just iterating it much faster. and i still feel the effecfts of the frequency. kind of interesting. My browser can only handle 767500 Sample rate though. My phone can handle 999999 Sample Rate. But increasing the sample rate makes the audio more effective in my experience. 20*60=1200 1200/30=40, so what you do accelerates the track's speed by 40 times, and interestingly does not lose any power. Cool. |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 29, 2024 2:05:32 GMT
If you multiply the sampling rate by 2 repeatedly until you're close to 767500 will ensure it's a multiple of the original sampling rate, which may be best.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 29, 2024 2:44:25 GMT
Take other creators morphic fields subliminals even rife frequencies. and convert them to wav. then change the sample rate of that file to as high as possible for whatever application you use. my radionics software caps at 1764000 on my computer. But it turns a 20 minute rife frequency into a 30 second clip not losing any of the data just iterating it much faster. and i still feel the effecfts of the frequency. kind of interesting. My browser can only handle 767500 Sample rate though. My phone can handle 999999 Sample Rate. But increasing the sample rate makes the audio more effective in my experience. If you're shifting a rife-frequency rather than a voice, it's going to change the fundamental frequency of it. So it might lose the effectiveness of the frequency you're going for. |
|
|
|
Post by meteagle on Apr 29, 2024 15:23:14 GMT
Take other creators morphic fields subliminals even rife frequencies. and convert them to wav. then change the sample rate of that file to as high as possible for whatever application you use. my radionics software caps at 1764000 on my computer. But it turns a 20 minute rife frequency into a 30 second clip not losing any of the data just iterating it much faster. and i still feel the effecfts of the frequency. kind of interesting. My browser can only handle 767500 Sample rate though. My phone can handle 999999 Sample Rate. But increasing the sample rate makes the audio more effective in my experience. how can i know the maximum sample rate that an application supports ? i use vlc on windows and ios |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 29, 2024 15:41:07 GMT
Take other creators morphic fields subliminals even rife frequencies. and convert them to wav. then change the sample rate of that file to as high as possible for whatever application you use. my radionics software caps at 1764000 on my computer. But it turns a 20 minute rife frequency into a 30 second clip not losing any of the data just iterating it much faster. and i still feel the effecfts of the frequency. kind of interesting. My browser can only handle 767500 Sample rate though. My phone can handle 999999 Sample Rate. But increasing the sample rate makes the audio more effective in my experience. how can i know the maximum sample rate that an application supports ? i use vlc on windows and ios I usually don't go above 767500. That's probably the safest one to use. |
|
|
|
Post by sound on Apr 30, 2024 17:24:52 GMT
I highly doubt this is wise. Just go with 96 kHz maximum, preferably 44.1 if no frequency above 20 kHz.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 30, 2024 17:27:40 GMT
I highly doubt this is wise. Just go with 96 kHz maximum, preferably 44.1 if no frequency above 20 kHz. Yeah, most of the time I use 96000 if I want to output to YouTube.
But making the sampling rate a multiple of 2 X frequency is more accurate, and keep that to 96000 or less.
|
|
