|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 17, 2024 19:08:27 GMT
The Multi-Format WAV Repeater replaces the two WAV Repeaters (Text and Unicode) and WAV Converter (Image to WAV).
It does the functionality of all three in one program. I still kept the old WAV programs in an Archive folder.
I added volume to it to allow you to select the volume.
And allowing a choice in the program for binary or text sampling option. It gives the estimated filesize for each option as a reference.
It's in my latest bundle in my signature.
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 23, 2024 18:03:18 GMT
I recommend 0-5% smoothing.
If you use 100% smoothing, it will be a pure sine wave and will lose the information of the original intention.
0% might sound more like noise. 5% is a good balance between the original data and a more pure tone.
Of course you can go higher if you want a more pure sound. I wouldn't recommend going higher than 50% smoothing.
|
|
|
Post by reden on Apr 24, 2024 2:57:18 GMT
I recommend 0-5% smoothing.
If you use 100% smoothing, it will be a pure sine wave and will lose the information of the original intention.
0% might sound more like noise. 5% is a good balance between the original data and a more pure tone.
Of course you can go higher if you want a more pure sound. I wouldn't recommend going higher than 50% smoothing.
Even though the physical information may be lost with 100% smoothing, the encoded energetic information is not.
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 26, 2024 10:09:50 GMT
For Sampling Option, #1 (Binary to WAV) is best if you are using images or binary files as input. You want as much of it to play as fast as possible when using images, so #1 is better for images or other binary files.
#2 is better for text.
One person was saying their file was over 10GB, and that was because they were choosing option #2 (Text to WAV), I believe for an image. Images need to repeat quickly, so that file is too long to be effective.
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 26, 2024 10:39:54 GMT
For Sampling Option, #1 (Binary to WAV) is best if you are using images or binary files as input. You want as much of it to play as fast as possible when using images, so #1 is better for images or other binary files.
#2 is better for text.
One person was saying their file was over 10GB, and that was because they were choosing option #2 (Text to WAV), I believe for an image. Images need to repeat quickly, so that file is too long to be effective.
Ok, they told me they have intentions file with over 100,000 characters, so #2 is better for text.
I mentioned they could raise the frequency used, and that will make the file size smaller.
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 26, 2024 19:15:15 GMT
I have updated the Multi-Format to WAV Repeater.
Before, when you chose 0% smoothing it wasn't applying the volume.
Updated bundle is in my signature.
|
|
deus
New Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by deus on Apr 27, 2024 20:40:08 GMT
For Sampling Option, #1 (Binary to WAV) is best if you are using images or binary files as input. You want as much of it to play as fast as possible when using images, so #1 is better for images or other binary files.
#2 is better for text.
One person was saying their file was over 10GB, and that was because they were choosing option #2 (Text to WAV), I believe for an image. Images need to repeat quickly, so that file is too long to be effective.
Well, I would love to pick #2 but the size isn't smiling
|
|
layla
New Member
Posts: 42
|
Post by layla on Apr 27, 2024 20:42:45 GMT
why did you use 10000 repetition and not 1?
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 27, 2024 20:58:54 GMT
why did you use 10000 repetition and not 1? Exactly. The WAV can be played on Repeat, so 1 repetition should be fine if you have a lot of intentions.
|
|
deus
New Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by deus on Apr 27, 2024 21:15:03 GMT
Ah. Naively, I thought of the number of repeats as the power of audio. I wanted to create the most amplified WAV possible, but anyway, choice 1 gave me a 2-hour file. Btw, is it possible to edit the wav afterwards with other software and speed it up/make several layers? This is my first use of the WAV repeater.
|
|
layla
New Member
Posts: 42
|
Post by layla on Apr 27, 2024 21:21:37 GMT
Ah. Naively, I thought of the number of repeats as the power of audio. I wanted to create the most amplified WAV possible, but anyway, choice 1 gave me a 2-hour file. Btw, is it possible to edit the wav afterwards with other software and speed it up/make several layers? This is my first use of the WAV repeater. i think channels are kinda layers, you can use 8 layers when the program ask 1-8-channels
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 27, 2024 21:24:56 GMT
Ah. Naively, I thought of the number of repeats as the power of audio. I wanted to create the most amplified WAV possible, but anyway, choice 1 gave me a 2-hour file. Btw, is it possible to edit the wav afterwards with other software and speed it up/make several layers? This is my first use of the WAV repeater. Yes, you can use Audacity to edit the WAV.
The amplification comes more from volume chosen.
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 27, 2024 21:25:51 GMT
Ah. Naively, I thought of the number of repeats as the power of audio. I wanted to create the most amplified WAV possible, but anyway, choice 1 gave me a 2-hour file. Btw, is it possible to edit the wav afterwards with other software and speed it up/make several layers? This is my first use of the WAV repeater. i think channels are kinda layers, you can use 8 layers when the program ask 1-8-channels Using 1 channel may be best in order to save on file size. I don't believe 8 channels is that much more powerful, but it may be. I haven't really tested. But 8 channel file will be 8X as big for Text to WAV.
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 27, 2024 21:28:29 GMT
Ah. Naively, I thought of the number of repeats as the power of audio. I wanted to create the most amplified WAV possible, but anyway, choice 1 gave me a 2-hour file. Btw, is it possible to edit the wav afterwards with other software and speed it up/make several layers? This is my first use of the WAV repeater. If you're doing Text intentions, doing 1 repeat with choice 2 would be best, if the ending file isn't too big. The body's energy field and subconscious can integrate a more gradual text to wav. If it's an image, then use Binary to WAV because you want those samples to repeat as fast as possible so that you can get a full experience of the full image closer together.
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 27, 2024 22:05:23 GMT
Ah. Naively, I thought of the number of repeats as the power of audio. I wanted to create the most amplified WAV possible, but anyway, choice 1 gave me a 2-hour file. Btw, is it possible to edit the wav afterwards with other software and speed it up/make several layers? This is my first use of the WAV repeater. I updated the latest Multi-Format to WAV Repeater (in the bundle in my Signature) to specify that repetitions affect length, not strength.
You can get the updated file from my signature.
|
|