|
Post by brandon on Apr 5, 2024 20:18:27 GMT
If I wanted to make an audio that, when listened to, gave me the benefits of my intentions, would using the WAV Repeater be better/the same/worse compared to charging an audio file with, say, IR MAX?
|
|
|
Post by brandon on Apr 5, 2024 20:25:57 GMT
I'd also like to suggest a feature/new program idea SOLELY for charging audios.
Like the new GUI you made. Like the layout could be:
Intention: x
(Or intention file)
Audio file:
RAM: 1.0
RUN
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 5, 2024 20:34:55 GMT
I'd also like to suggest a feature/new program idea SOLELY for charging audios. Like the new GUI you made. Like the layout could be: Intention: x (Or intention file) Audio file: RAM: 1.0 RUN There are 3 WAV audio generators I have. Image to WAV - This is more compressed because each character is mapped to a sample in the WAV. It sounds somewhat noisy unless smoothed.
Text to WAV - In this, the frequency chosen (i.e. 528Hz) is how many characters per second appear in the audio. Less noisy, but smoothing is good.
Unicode to WAV - Like the Text to WAV, but works with Unicode characters, like emojis.
Which type of audio generator were you thinking of?
Or was it just charging already created audios? There's a way to do that with the Repeater MAX and Repeater MAX CUDA already.
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 5, 2024 20:36:56 GMT
If I wanted to make an audio that, when listened to, gave me the benefits of my intentions, would using the WAV Repeater be better/the same/worse compared to charging an audio file with, say, IR MAX? It depends on the mood and the time, as it changes. Sometimes Repeater MAX works better. Sometimes a WAV is better.
|
|
|
Post by brandon on Apr 5, 2024 21:26:48 GMT
I'd also like to suggest a feature/new program idea SOLELY for charging audios. Like the new GUI you made. Like the layout could be: Intention: x (Or intention file) Audio file: RAM: 1.0 RUN There are 3 WAV audio generators I have. Image to WAV - This is more compressed because each character is mapped to a sample in the WAV. It sounds somewhat noisy unless smoothed.
Text to WAV - In this, the frequency chosen (i.e. 528Hz) is how many characters per second appear in the audio. Less noisy, but smoothing is good.
Unicode to WAV - Like the Text to WAV, but works with Unicode characters, like emojis.
Which type of audio generator were you thinking of?
Or was it just charging already created audios? There's a way to do that with the Repeater MAX and Repeater MAX CUDA already.
Yeah I meant charging an already created audio. I made my suggestion in case it could've been more effective than charging using MAX/MAX CUDA
|
|