|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 4, 2024 19:04:35 GMT
I found this talk fascinating, where he mentions an Infinite Wikipedia where new articles are generated on the fly as you click links.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 4, 2024 19:09:26 GMT
Though I haven't been able to find an infinite wikipedia online. He just mentions it, so it's probably coming.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 4, 2024 19:16:44 GMT
Reden said this is like an infinite wikipedia that generates pages on the fly: websim.ai/I'm giving it a try now. |
|
|
|
Post by reden on Apr 4, 2024 19:20:11 GMT
Reden said this is like an infinite wikipedia that generates pages on the fly: websim.ai/I'm giving it a try now. It's an Infinite AI-Generated Internet. They may or may not run out of tokens randomly, you can check in their discord if there's any issue discord.gg/websim |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 4, 2024 19:21:11 GMT
I tried websim.ai but it didn't create links within its generated wikipedia article. I just searched for something in it about anthro red foxes, and it created a good article, but no links to more info.
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Apr 4, 2024 19:27:42 GMT
I tried websim.ai but it didn't create links within its generated wikipedia article. I just searched for something in it about anthro red foxes, and it created a good article, but no links to more info. You can add the parameter &morelinks=true to the URL to make more links appear. You can customize your experience a lot by modifying the URL parameters. |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 4, 2024 21:02:44 GMT
websim.ai is a little slow. Would be nice if Groq would implement it actually.
|
|
|
|
Post by nathanmyersc on Apr 4, 2024 21:11:55 GMT
websim.ai is a little slow. Would be nice if Groq would implement it actually. Sounnds like a scifi writers dream. get articles on the fly about any subject they are trying to flesh out. |
|
|
|
Post by reden on Apr 4, 2024 21:19:03 GMT
websim.ai is a little slow. Would be nice if Groq would implement it actually. Only Claude is creative and free minded by default enough to work well in WebSim. Open Source models were tried in closed tests, but they didn't perform very well. GPT is "uncreative" according to their discord and wouldn't be useful. Groq doesn't have support for Claude as it's proprietary. |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 5, 2024 0:09:57 GMT
Is Claude Haiku good enough to perform like WebSim if it were used?
It's the lowest cost model of theirs and the fastest.
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Apr 5, 2024 0:55:30 GMT
Is Claude Haiku good enough to perform like WebSim if it were used? It's the lowest cost model of theirs and the fastest. Yes, they have used when they exhausted Opus tokens, then Sonnet tokens. One time they even exhausted Haiku tokens. They upgraded to a bigger API plan and now don't have issues nearly as often. However, Sonnet and Opus are (far) more creative. They made the blinking octopus CSS I posted in the Sentient AI thread, for example. |
|
