|
|
Post by brandon on Mar 8, 2024 18:03:45 GMT
Id like to see your guys' opinion on this topic.
So, if I was making a personal audio field for muscle growth, would it be better to:
A - use simple intentions, e.g. "I have large muscles. My muscles are constantly growing rapidly"
or
B - research the topic extensively, e.g. "I have the C313Y mutation of the MSTN gene. The sensitivity and density of mechanosensors on my skeletal muscles is constantly increasing." And other extremely scientific intentions.
Which do you think would be more effective?
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Mar 8, 2024 18:40:57 GMT
Id like to see your guys' opinion on this topic. So, if I was making a personal audio field for muscle growth, would it be better to: A - use simple intentions, e.g. "I have large muscles. My muscles are constantly growing rapidly" or B - research the topic extensively, e.g. "I have the C313Y mutation of the MSTN gene. The sensitivity and density of mechanosensors on my skeletal muscles is constantly increasing." And other extremely scientific intentions. Which do you think would be more effective? Both are effective. The simple intentions let the Universe's intelligence manage everything, while the extensive intentions let you have the specified effects. The simple intentions are of course easier to write. |
|
|
|
Post by brandon on Mar 9, 2024 16:38:50 GMT
Id like to see your guys' opinion on this topic. So, if I was making a personal audio field for muscle growth, would it be better to: A - use simple intentions, e.g. "I have large muscles. My muscles are constantly growing rapidly" or B - research the topic extensively, e.g. "I have the C313Y mutation of the MSTN gene. The sensitivity and density of mechanosensors on my skeletal muscles is constantly increasing." And other extremely scientific intentions. Which do you think would be more effective? Both are effective. The simple intentions let the Universe's intelligence manage everything, while the extensive intentions let you have the specified effects. The simple intentions are of course easier to write. Alright. However, if I was to mention specific gene mutations, like C313Y mutation of the MSTN gene, then would I also need to write an explanatory sentence in my intention? Also, what's your guys' opinion on even mimicking NUTRIENTS? Like an intention such as: "I have received 100g of high quality protein." ? |
|
|
|
Post by reden on Mar 9, 2024 18:13:32 GMT
Both are effective. The simple intentions let the Universe's intelligence manage everything, while the extensive intentions let you have the specified effects. The simple intentions are of course easier to write. Alright. However, if I was to mention specific gene mutations, like C313Y mutation of the MSTN gene, then would I also need to write an explanatory sentence in my intention? Also, what's your guys' opinion on even mimicking NUTRIENTS? Like an intention such as: "I have received 100g of high quality protein." ? >However, if I was to mention specific gene mutations, like C313Y mutation of the MSTN gene, then would I also need to write an explanatory sentence in my intention? No, but you can combine both types of intentions. >Also, what's your guys' opinion on even mimicking NUTRIENTS? Like an intention such as: "I have received 100g of high quality protein." ? This could work. |
|
|
|
Post by brandon on Mar 9, 2024 19:27:05 GMT
Alright. However, if I was to mention specific gene mutations, like C313Y mutation of the MSTN gene, then would I also need to write an explanatory sentence in my intention? Also, what's your guys' opinion on even mimicking NUTRIENTS? Like an intention such as: "I have received 100g of high quality protein." ? >However, if I was to mention specific gene mutations, like C313Y mutation of the MSTN gene, then would I also need to write an explanatory sentence in my intention? No, but you can combine both types of intentions. >Also, what's your guys' opinion on even mimicking NUTRIENTS? Like an intention such as: "I have received 100g of high quality protein." ? This could work. >This could work. I definitely think it would. If the repeater is able to mimic things such as the use of steroids and even workouts, why not nutrients?  |
|
cainmarko
New Member
Posts: 2
Member is Online
|
Post by cainmarko on Mar 12, 2024 7:45:45 GMT
Hi guys, do you notice a quicker result when asking the repeater for one specific thing or a small list of intentions (like the muscle ones above) compared to a long intentions.txt or would you say there's no difference in the speed it fulfils it?
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Mar 12, 2024 12:45:47 GMT
Hi guys, do you notice a quicker result when asking the repeater for one specific thing or a small list of intentions (like the muscle ones above) compared to a long intentions.txt or would you say there's no difference in the speed it fulfils it? There's a slowdown when using a file. This slowdown is due to it being a file, not affected by how many lines it has. But I would say it doesn't matter that much specially if you run it for a long time, as energy builds up. |
|
cainmarko
New Member
Posts: 2
Member is Online
|
Post by cainmarko on Mar 14, 2024 10:13:45 GMT
Thanks reden, really appreciate it. The repeater and associated programs all have so much potential, it's great to have found them.
|
|
|
|
Post by brandon on Mar 14, 2024 18:41:01 GMT
Hi guys, do you notice a quicker result when asking the repeater for one specific thing or a small list of intentions (like the muscle ones above) compared to a long intentions.txt or would you say there's no difference in the speed it fulfils it? There's a slowdown when using a file. This slowdown is due to it being a file, not affected by how many lines it has. But I would say it doesn't matter that much specially if you run it for a long time, as energy builds up. > run it for a long time I've done this thing when charging my audios where 1 minute of charging in my reality equals 10,000 years of charging for the Servitor. And that 1 minute of listening to the charged audio equals receiving the benefits and positive, desirable results from listening for 100 years. I believe this works while simultaneously saving a lot of time, what's your opinion? |
|
|
|
Post by reden on Mar 14, 2024 19:03:59 GMT
There's a slowdown when using a file. This slowdown is due to it being a file, not affected by how many lines it has. But I would say it doesn't matter that much specially if you run it for a long time, as energy builds up. > run it for a long time I've done this thing when charging my audios where 1 minute of charging in my reality equals 10,000 years of charging for the Servitor. And that 1 minute of listening to the charged audio equals receiving the benefits and positive, desirable results from listening for 100 years. I believe this works while simultaneously saving a lot of time, what's your opinion? It's a brilliant idea. |
|
