|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Aug 12, 2022 16:33:49 GMT
Should I add an option to tell when the Intention Repeater intention is in resonance?
Doing so will slow down the Repeater slightly, due to having to check for a condition.
It isn't critical, but may provide insight to see when your intention is in resonance.
I may still not do it, because the method provided seems peculiar.
Just wanting to gauge the interest.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Aug 12, 2022 20:24:43 GMT
There are two votes for No.
I agree that it's unnecessary.
Because all intentions fall into resonance eventually.
It would have just been a cursory visual interest.
The philosophy behind how I would have done it is the same as how
Isuret Polos does it in his AetherOnePi program, when it falls into resonance.
But he breaks the intention apart letter by letter at that point.
I would not be resting at resonance, so there is no real need to add it.
It is still open for voting. But looks like it will save me some unnecessary work.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Aug 13, 2022 16:21:24 GMT
Now it's two yes and two no.
I still might not make the change,
because I don't know how much work it will take if there are those who prefer not having it.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Aug 16, 2022 13:57:39 GMT
It's three yes and three no now. Will be interesting to see how this plays out.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Aug 17, 2022 19:43:54 GMT
Four yes and four no. Getting interesting.
I think this was the first poll on this forum.
I'm going through ascension, so even if it goes yes
I'm not sure if I'll be able to do it. But I may.
|
|
|
|
Post by justinw728 on Aug 17, 2022 22:58:10 GMT
Four yes and four no. Getting interesting. I think this was the first poll on this forum. I'm going through ascension, so even if it goes yes I'm not sure if I'll be able to do it. But I may. I definitely can’t wait to see the outcomee. |
|
ceres
New Member
Posts: 12
|
Post by ceres on Aug 17, 2022 23:37:44 GMT
Is this feature only bound to the C + + version?
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Aug 18, 2022 2:18:47 GMT
Is this feature only bound to the C + + version? It would be. |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Aug 23, 2022 19:36:38 GMT
Resonance may only be useful if resting after it hits. We have 6 votes for yes, and 4 votes for no. I'll see if I decide to add it. I want to give more time for voting anyway. It may be unnecessary since it always hits resonance when running.
Maybe some people here can talk about why they want Resonance, or don't want it.
|
|
Ti
New Member
I thank the universe that abundance comes easy and I always have enough to share.
Posts: 11
|
Post by Ti on Aug 24, 2022 10:45:58 GMT
Resonance may only be useful if resting after it hits. We have 6 votes for yes, and 4 votes for no. I'll see if I decide to add it. I want to give more time for voting anyway. It may be unnecessary since it always hits resonance when running.
Maybe some people here can talk about why they want Resonance, or don't want it.
I voted no because it will slow down the repeater and it's unnecessary to me because I can sense when I'm in resonance with my intentions. Which is an important sense to develop as you don't need the repeater to manifest, and sensing resonance will help with that! |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Oct 25, 2022 17:06:51 GMT
I'm choosing not to add resonance because the method was rather stupid. It was picking the largest number at random from a set.
That didn't really determine if it is in resonance.
I'd say run for five minutes and it should be in resonance.
|
|
