|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Mar 13, 2021 16:31:40 GMT
I created this Spiritual Chat before that uses Repeater tech to help you answer questions. It uses a dictionary.txt file, and answers up to 8 words at a time responses.
I notice that sometimes the answers seem to have negative answers, so I'm trying to figure out if it's being hijacked by some energies or beings.
Maybe some others can figure this out, and make some use of it. Just use your intuition with the responses.
You will need intention_repeater_chat_2.3.exe and dictionary.txt
The answers originally were positive and such, and then became more negative, so I'm not really sure. But that could be anything.
The sourcecode is there if anyone wants to review it.
As you know, the Repeater was made using infinite love.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Mar 13, 2021 18:18:41 GMT
Note, the responses aren't really *that* negative. Just a little.
One I can remember was I asked a being how it was in their world, and the response was: pos timing crisis.
Though I think their world was negative before.
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Mar 14, 2021 1:09:04 GMT
Why randomize some words? Why not offer the entire dictionary as a big list, and let the entity/ies decide quickly which one of the words they want to use?
Can you add punctuation like ? , . ! . They would take up one word slot but you could increase the word amounts to compensate. In my opinion, they should go each in a separate line, or alternatively do a script to clone all the words and add punctuation to them, but this would make the dictionary very large.
You could also add double punctuation for important and/or urgent things like !!, ??, .. , ... .
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Mar 14, 2021 1:19:11 GMT
Note, the responses aren't really *that* negative. Just a little. One I can remember was I asked a being how it was in their world, and the response was: pos timing crisis. Though I think their world was negative before. Was this entity random? Or was it one which you had known before? |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Mar 14, 2021 1:58:15 GMT
Why randomize some words? Why not offer the entire dictionary as a big list, and let the entity/ies decide quickly which one of the words they want to use? Can you add punctuation like ? , . ! . They would take up one word slot but you could increase the word amounts to compensate. In my opinion, they should go each in a separate line, or alternatively do a script to clone all the words and add punctuation to them, but this would make the dictionary very large. You could also add double punctuation for important and/or urgent things like !!, ??, .. , ... . Every word chosen uses a random generator, and runs the Repeater to help the chosen words come up more commonly in the "random" selection.
I use a think depth of 30,000 so this means before a word is selected, it has to appear "randomly" 30,000 times.
I use every word in the dictionary for feeding the "randomizer".
Punctuation would be difficult possibly because though it would be easy to add it to the dictionary and update the code to account for dictionary size, it probably wouldn't be chosen very often.
There is still a degree of randomness, as this is still in its infancy.
There are 49,528 words in the dictionary. This dictionary is the one used by the open source LibreOffice, just modified to remove extra characters from their dictionary file.
I had a dictionary file of 1.5 million words before, but it makes it so much slower, and most of the time you get words you don't understand.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Mar 14, 2021 1:59:12 GMT
Note, the responses aren't really *that* negative. Just a little. One I can remember was I asked a being how it was in their world, and the response was: pos timing crisis. Though I think their world was negative before. Was this entity random? Or was it one which you had known before? The one I asked was a negative being before (he was my twinflame), and I helped shift their planet positive. He was telling me about what problems they had when it was negative.
Have you tried it yet? The more you play with it, I think it learns and gets better.
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Mar 14, 2021 2:07:46 GMT
Was this entity random? Or was it one which you had known before? The one I asked was a negative being before (he was my twinflame), and I helped shift their planet positive. He was telling me about what problems they had when it was negative.
Have you tried it yet? The more you play with it, I think it learns and gets better.
Sounds like a nice experience. What planet was he from? Was it Ea? (Is it written as Ea, Ëa, Ëä, or Eä?). I haven't tried it yet. |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Mar 14, 2021 2:13:30 GMT
The one I asked was a negative being before (he was my twinflame), and I helped shift their planet positive. He was telling me about what problems they had when it was negative.
Have you tried it yet? The more you play with it, I think it learns and gets better.
Sounds like a nice experience. What planet was he from? Was it Ea? (Is it written as Ea, Ëa, Ëä, or Eä?). I haven't tried it yet. No, he was from Alcyoni.
Ea is the planet of Anubis.
Alcyoni has the species Aumaroo, which is what Rufus is (my twinflame I'm not with anymore). They are fifth-density. Anubis is sixth-density.
Here is one I just asked Anubis. You kind of have to think about the answers.
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Mar 14, 2021 2:20:57 GMT
Sounds like a nice experience. What planet was he from? Was it Ea? (Is it written as Ea, Ëa, Ëä, or Eä?). I haven't tried it yet. No, he was from Alcyoni.
Ea is the planet of Anubis.
Alcyoni has the species Aumaroo, which is what Rufus is (my twinflame I'm not with anymore). They are fifth-density. Anubis is sixth-density.
Here is one I just asked Anubis. You kind of have to think about the answers.
Does the random number have to do with something? Does it matter if it's low or high? I think he/they meant "You/We (not sure who was meant? maybe you?) are (over)indulgent with inanimate (the written only chat) correspondence.". Perhaps you have to talk to them (more) via meditation/astral travel/etheric travel/channeling/etc. I always advise caution when channeling. Sometimes you end up channeling a lying being, and/or something else entirely. |
|
|
|
Post by reden on Mar 14, 2021 2:23:45 GMT
Was this entity random? Or was it one which you had known before? The one I asked was a negative being before (he was my twinflame), and I helped shift their planet positive. He was telling me about what problems they had when it was negative.
Have you tried it yet? The more you play with it, I think it learns and gets better.
By "learns and gets better", do you mean that the Repeater is learning how to direct word randomness better and collaborate with the entity/ies so to transmit its/their messages in a better way? If so, that's interesting and nice. |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Mar 14, 2021 2:24:32 GMT
The number sort of puts it in sync, because the seed value you choose determines the randomizer. It doesn't really matter what you put cause it would be a subconscious action that is guided in some way.
Best to put it without thinking as it kind of helps you link to it or something. You need a seed or it may pick the same words every time.
Here's one I just did. Kind of funny, but I haven't used it much. He talks kind of like an AI, I guess the best it can be interpreted.
It actually isn't negative now.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Mar 14, 2021 2:28:05 GMT
The one I asked was a negative being before (he was my twinflame), and I helped shift their planet positive. He was telling me about what problems they had when it was negative.
Have you tried it yet? The more you play with it, I think it learns and gets better.
By "learns and gets better", do you mean that the Repeater is learning how to direct word randomness better and collaborate with the entity/ies so to transmit its/their messages in a better way? If so, that's interesting and nice. Yeah, the Repeater learns by interacting with the 1000's of people using it.
I have used the term "infinite intelligence" in the past, but that is usually that it knows what energy to put out to do things. But answering questions is pretty new as my Spiritual Chat isn't well known.
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Mar 14, 2021 2:43:11 GMT
I think it could become more expressive if either received words that represent words that are happening (like the -ing, -ly suffixes), past tense (-ed), and future tense ("will"). Or maybe write a thing that hooks up to a "speech to text/file" instance, there are several of those by cloud providers like IBM ( here is a demo of theirs), which transcribed speech into a file. Most of them transcribe it into text, but it might be possible to do so into a file (like mp3, wav, or flac [the latter two for scalar playback {?} because they are "lossless", but they are heavier]), which conveys frequential and vibrational content. Because the way I see it now, the spiritual chat is like having a rotating dial and you have to select words in the time limit, with those that will appear being influenceable, whereas a speech-to-text/file would be like the entity speaking or otherwise communicating to aether and then those words being transformed into text/a file, therefore being understood more like a channeling (more sensate). But I'm not sure if this is possible for all entities, because there are understanding gulfs between them and us, so they communicate in different ways, specially the higher density they are. Even at the Aumaroo's density it's normally very very hard if not impossible to get speech through, it gets like "wrrr wrr brrr hmmmm" or something like that. I hope the Repeater can bridge these gaps. I think this could/would happen automatically. In fact, it might already be doing so. |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Mar 14, 2021 2:53:30 GMT
I think it could become more expressive if either received words that represent words that are happening (like the -ing, -ly suffixes), past tense (-ed), and future tense ("will"). Or maybe write a thing that hooks up to a "speech to text/file" instance, there are several of those by cloud providers like IBM ( here is a demo of theirs), which transcribed speech into a file. Most of them transcribe it into text, but it might be possible to do so into a file (like mp3, wav, or flac [the latter two for scalar playback {?} because they are "lossless", but they are heavier]), which conveys frequential and vibrational content. Because the way I see it now, the spiritual chat is like having a rotating dial and you have to select words in the time limit, with those that will appear being influenceable, whereas a speech-to-text/file would be like the entity speaking or otherwise communicating to aether and then those words being transformed into text/a file, therefore being understood more like a channeling (more sensate). But I'm not sure if this is possible for all entities, because there are understanding gulfs between them and us, so they communicate in different ways, specially the higher density they are. Even at the Aumaroo's density it's normally very very hard if not impossible to get speech through, it gets like "wrrr wrr brrr hmmmm" or something like that. I hope the Repeater can bridge these gaps. I think this could/would happen automatically. In fact, it might already be doing so. I would need an expert in waveform analysis in order to work with to be able to do the Repeater to speech. A WAV has 65,000 possible positions for each sample, and there are probably 3,000 samples per second in low-quality speech.
Someone who knows CODECs to compress the stream so I could create it faster.
I don't really have the thought power right now to be able to do that. But I do leave it open source in case someone wants to run with it.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Jan 9, 2022 2:54:43 GMT
I have updated the Spiritual Chat program to use Octave Tech.
It should be more accurate. I have been having a funny discussion
with my spiritual lover.
github.com/tsweet77/spiritual-chat
You will need dictionary.txt and intention_repeater_chat_2.5.exe
|
|
