|
Post by AnthroHeart on Aug 21, 2024 23:52:24 GMT
I repeated the intention "I am cleared, healed, balanced and release what I do not need." 10 million times. Then I hashed this to a 32-byte string, and repeated that to 100 levels.
I came up with this:
6AC8571365A40057BC1480370A90A3812E0BD1DB81D9B8835EF38FDE1C9B4B12
Hashing that intention to 100 levels, with 10 million repetitions each is quite powerful.
I feel this number strongly.
Each hashing level is 10 million times more iterations, compressed.
You can find the sha256_multihash utility in my latest MAX Bundle in my signature. It's also in the Talisman File Writer folder.
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Aug 22, 2024 0:03:16 GMT
It feels stronger than the Grabovoi Codes.
It takes about 2-5 mins to generate a hash value for an intention to 100 levels and 10 million repeats each.
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Aug 22, 2024 0:52:06 GMT
Here is the 100-Level Hash for "I am on a good, strong magic mushrooms experience."
0E5DC25E93462763809D7726E92E3E032C8866A71645F34D20777CD932CFD8CC
This seems stronger than even Sanskrit, the strongest language I had found before.
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Aug 24, 2024 5:22:05 GMT
I learned that when I'm hashing my intention using Multi-Hash_OpenSSL.exe (Multi-Hash.exe should work too) I feel it running strongly. It builds up in strength as it runs.
The limit of hash levels says 1000 in the utility. But you could put 1000000 (1 Million) and leave it running. This wouldn't display a hash, but would keep hashing your intention in memory, making it stronger.
So it's like running the Repeater but different.
Give it a try and see if you feel anything.
Level 1000 with 10M reps takes about 20 mins to run.
It isn't at 3Hz though. It takes too long to multiply the hashes to be able to do it that fast.
It takes about 12 seconds to do 10 Hash Levels. We're hashing at less than 1Hz.
Which is great and probably why I can feel it.
But it doesn't feel as strong as the Repeater Python when using a good Hash Code.
I might need to play around with settings to see if repeater hashing can be made stronger.
|
|
|
Post by reden on Aug 25, 2024 22:11:07 GMT
Everything on my Property and Earth are Bubble Tech + Merlin Trance Music Video SHA256 (Ev.mkv) = e55a7bfd8b72bc6e1df0e382ca56f3d690767bf06b0b9ad70ed70541d50a3eda
Enter Text or Filename: e55a7bfd8b72bc6e1df0e382ca56f3d690767bf06b0b9ad70ed70541d50a3eda Number of times to Repeat [1-10000000]: 1000000 Number of Hash Levels [1-100]: 10 Hashing Level 10 [Repeats: 1000000] (Hash level: 10): 58E0682ACC97C3E42A379172DAB4FA635387900A47C449DD4EFE458ABBCF6537
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Aug 25, 2024 22:14:17 GMT
Everything on my Property and Earth are Bubble Tech + Merlin Trance Music Video SHA256 (Ev.mkv) = e55a7bfd8b72bc6e1df0e382ca56f3d690767bf06b0b9ad70ed70541d50a3eda Enter Text or Filename: e55a7bfd8b72bc6e1df0e382ca56f3d690767bf06b0b9ad70ed70541d50a3eda Number of times to Repeat [1-10000000]: 1000000 Number of Hash Levels [1-100]: 10 Hashing Level 10 [Repeats: 1000000] (Hash level: 10): 58E0682ACC97C3E42A379172DAB4FA635387900A47C449DD4EFE458ABBCF6537I can tell the 2nd code is stronger than the first. It feels floaty.
|
|
|
Post by reden on Aug 25, 2024 22:45:48 GMT
Here is its QR Code.
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Aug 25, 2024 23:42:47 GMT
Are you going to make a QR Code with a SHA-3-512?
|
|
|
Post by reden on Aug 25, 2024 23:44:40 GMT
Are you going to make a QR Code with a SHA-3-512? Yes I just did on the other thread
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Aug 29, 2024 14:40:30 GMT
I updated the Multi-Hash_OpenSSL_SHA3-512_Preserve_Original.exe program.
Before, it was uppercasing each hash step. Normal hashes are lowercase from the functions.
In this update, I just uppercase at the end. At the end, it doesn't matter if the final hash is uppercase.
It feels energetically 10X better by not uppercasing at each hash step.
So this new version is like 10X better than the original.
You can get the updated Multi-Hash bundle from my signature.
It's also in the larger MAX Bundle.
It may run a tiny bit faster due to not needing to uppercase.
I also found that using traditional programming methods produces a better feeling hash code. I found two identical hash codes that were created with different method can feel different.
|
|