|
|
Post by spaceindebt on Nov 4, 2024 23:00:45 GMT
I updated the Daemon to fix certain intention updates to make sure they don't mess up the data file. I also added more comments to the code. I also added a Restart All button. I also added a message box for when the icon is not found. I also added a version number now. I renamed servitor_connect_daemon.exe to ServitorConnect_Daemon.exe. Same for the .py.
Version 1.5.
It takes like 15 seconds to launch sometimes.
Let me know if you have problems with it because I think the tkinter I use for message box caused some issues before.
How much more powerful does this feel than the web browser version? |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Nov 4, 2024 23:04:06 GMT
I updated the Daemon to fix certain intention updates to make sure they don't mess up the data file. I also added more comments to the code. I also added a Restart All button. I also added a message box for when the icon is not found. I also added a version number now. I renamed servitor_connect_daemon.exe to ServitorConnect_Daemon.exe. Same for the .py.
Version 1.5.
It takes like 15 seconds to launch sometimes.
Let me know if you have problems with it because I think the tkinter I use for message box caused some issues before.
How much more powerful does this feel than the web browser version? I haven't compared directly, but one person said they couldn't feel the web version and only felt the Python version. This is based off the Python version.
It's more convenient. I'm running 16 tabs on my daemon now. Charging up food, stonehenge, the vatican, and other things. Even the wallpaper on my computer to make morphic fields.
All together they feel pretty strong. When I first made the Daemon I thought it felt stronger than the web version, at least twice as strong, but I can't be sure.
I don't run the web one now.
|
|
|
|
Post by spaceindebt on Nov 4, 2024 23:22:55 GMT
How much more powerful does this feel than the web browser version? I haven't compared directly, but one person said they couldn't feel the web version and only felt the Python version. This is based off the Python version.
It's more convenient. I'm running 16 tabs on my daemon now. Charging up food, stonehenge, the vatican, and other things. Even the wallpaper on my computer to make morphic fields.
All together they feel pretty strong. When I first made the Daemon I thought it felt stronger than the web version, at least twice as strong, but I can't be sure.
I don't run the web one now.
Even when asleep? |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Nov 4, 2024 23:29:14 GMT
I haven't compared directly, but one person said they couldn't feel the web version and only felt the Python version. This is based off the Python version.
It's more convenient. I'm running 16 tabs on my daemon now. Charging up food, stonehenge, the vatican, and other things. Even the wallpaper on my computer to make morphic fields.
All together they feel pretty strong. When I first made the Daemon I thought it felt stronger than the web version, at least twice as strong, but I can't be sure.
I don't run the web one now.
Even when asleep? I do leave it running when I sleep and I had good dreams on Halloween. Though I don't feel it when I'm sleeping, but I think it still works. |
|
sakata
Junior Member
Posts: 50
|
Post by sakata on Nov 5, 2024 13:58:36 GMT
How much more powerful does this feel than the web browser version? I haven't compared directly, but one person said they couldn't feel the web version and only felt the Python version. This is based off the Python version.
It's more convenient. I'm running 16 tabs on my daemon now. Charging up food, stonehenge, the vatican, and other things. Even the wallpaper on my computer to make morphic fields.
All together they feel pretty strong. When I first made the Daemon I thought it felt stronger than the web version, at least twice as strong, but I can't be sure.
I don't run the web one now.
Was it twice as strong even with single tab of intention? So basically same intention ran with twice the intensity? |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Nov 5, 2024 14:32:40 GMT
I haven't compared directly, but one person said they couldn't feel the web version and only felt the Python version. This is based off the Python version.
It's more convenient. I'm running 16 tabs on my daemon now. Charging up food, stonehenge, the vatican, and other things. Even the wallpaper on my computer to make morphic fields.
All together they feel pretty strong. When I first made the Daemon I thought it felt stronger than the web version, at least twice as strong, but I can't be sure.
I don't run the web one now.
Was it twice as strong even with single tab of intention? So basically same intention ran with twice the intensity? I don't know myself, but I asked the pendulum and it says the Daemon is the same strength as the website.
The website POSTS the intention and the daemon assigns it to a variable. Different way of doing the same thing.
But the person said they could feel the daemon where they didn't feel the website. So, not sure.
The daemon is just more convenient and lets you run locally and looks nicer I think.
The web one also has the problem of sometimes stopping running or being delayed when using FireFox or Chrome browser. The daemon doesn't stop like that.
I'm running the daemon on a $12/month VPS so I can run it all the time, even with my own pc off.
If you have Linux you can run the .exe file with Wine, or run the Python.
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Nov 5, 2024 16:14:07 GMT
Was it twice as strong even with single tab of intention? So basically same intention ran with twice the intensity? I don't know myself, but I asked the pendulum and it says the Daemon is the same strength as the website.
The website POSTS the intention and the daemon assigns it to a variable. Different way of doing the same thing.
But the person said they could feel the daemon where they didn't feel the website. So, not sure.
The daemon is just more convenient and lets you run locally and looks nicer I think.
The web one also has the problem of sometimes stopping running or being delayed when using FireFox or Chrome browser. The daemon doesn't stop like that.
I'm running the daemon on a $12/month VPS so I can run it all the time, even with my own pc off.
If you have Linux you can run the .exe file with Wine, or run the Python.
The person had said IIRC the app didn't work but the Python did, and I think the web also worked. |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Nov 5, 2024 16:44:22 GMT
I don't know myself, but I asked the pendulum and it says the Daemon is the same strength as the website.
The website POSTS the intention and the daemon assigns it to a variable. Different way of doing the same thing.
But the person said they could feel the daemon where they didn't feel the website. So, not sure.
The daemon is just more convenient and lets you run locally and looks nicer I think.
The web one also has the problem of sometimes stopping running or being delayed when using FireFox or Chrome browser. The daemon doesn't stop like that.
I'm running the daemon on a $12/month VPS so I can run it all the time, even with my own pc off.
If you have Linux you can run the .exe file with Wine, or run the Python.
The person had said IIRC the app didn't work but the Python did, and I think the web also worked. He said this "Hello, I wanted to let you know that for some reason when I run the Servitor connect python code on a python code runner on my android phone I can feel and get my results while not getting any from the android app and I don't know why. So l, I wanted to know if you can edit the code to add pull up a window to pickup the file instead of writing file location path as it doesn't seem to be able to read it"
There wasn't a mention of if they feel the SerivtorConnect web app.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Nov 5, 2024 19:11:00 GMT
I don't know myself, but I asked the pendulum and it says the Daemon is the same strength as the website.
The website POSTS the intention and the daemon assigns it to a variable. Different way of doing the same thing.
But the person said they could feel the daemon where they didn't feel the website. So, not sure.
The daemon is just more convenient and lets you run locally and looks nicer I think.
The web one also has the problem of sometimes stopping running or being delayed when using FireFox or Chrome browser. The daemon doesn't stop like that.
I'm running the daemon on a $12/month VPS so I can run it all the time, even with my own pc off.
If you have Linux you can run the .exe file with Wine, or run the Python.
The person had said IIRC the app didn't work but the Python did, and I think the web also worked. He actually just said "For some reason, I don't why, but i don't feel that much using the website. But I do with the Python code" |
|
|
|
Post by justinw728 on Nov 6, 2024 0:11:47 GMT
The person had said IIRC the app didn't work but the Python did, and I think the web also worked. He actually just said "For some reason, I don't why, but i don't feel that much using the website. But I do with the Python code" This is interesting I’ll have to try it out. |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Nov 7, 2024 21:29:48 GMT
I updated the Daemon to allow for copying a tab. I learned that running multiple tabs of the same intention is even more powerful.
I duplicated my main intention in the image below 10000 times. I can definitely tell it's much stronger when playing all.
It takes about 30 seconds to 1 minute to duplicate that many tabs.
I recommend putting this in its own folder so you can specify from scratch an intention to duplicate. 10000 times is good I think.
Updated to v1.6. Notice the new Copy Tab button.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Nov 7, 2024 21:47:43 GMT
Wow, 10000 repetitions is intensely strong. It's too strong for me after like 10 minutes. I think something more like 100 copies of the tab might be even better for me personally.
With the Copy Tab it's now the strongest tool I have.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Nov 7, 2024 22:39:11 GMT
To do 10000X duplication you might need like 16GB of RAM.
Start with 1000 if you want to make sure it runs fluidly, unless you have 16GB of RAM.
|
|
|
|
Post by wonder on Nov 8, 2024 1:38:19 GMT
Is there a way to make it run using the visual card/GPU? As my memory and CPU are always stressed. But SSD and GPU are at 1% use.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Nov 8, 2024 2:21:06 GMT
Is there a way to make it run using the visual card/GPU? As my memory and CPU are always stressed. But SSD and GPU are at 1% use. It uses regular RAM. It doesn't use much CPU only repeating once per hour.
I am duplicating 100X a tab and it's only using 33MB of RAM.
If you don't duplicate too much it should be fine I think.
|
|
