Me and my Questions :-)

I've been told by different radionic practitioners that the microcontroller and microprocessor machines don't speak to them the way the older transistor and IC ones do, and i've been told by even older school pracs that the IC and transistor ones also don't work as well as the old tube amps did.

I chalk it up to different machines with different components speak to us differently, and i guess some people are more in tune with certain machine types than others.

Historically, there are different power circuits in a radionic unit as well as different amplification circuits. The differences change the way a radionic unit operates.

Earth-based power sources (natural earth electromagnetism, optical/optoelectronic light, or carrier waves) operate differently than electrical power sources (such as direct or alternating current). The electrical power sources carry a lot more juice.

Also, the different generations of analog amplification (tube amps) and digital amplification (transistor amps, and post-transistors such as integrated controllers, microcontrollers, and microprocessors) give different outputs. From what i gather, Isuret uses machines based on microcontrollers and code so his machines output digital signals as does the IR, which uses a computer's motherboard as its microprocessor.

In general, analog amplification delivers standing waves while digital amplification uses logic gates to deliver output as light and sound particles. This gives analog signal a smoother flow while digital signal is more grainy in general. With the advent of floating-point technology, digital bitrates and signal chains have become much more high-fidelity to the point it's hard for microphones or the ear to tell the difference between them, but at the body/mind level we can all tell the difference between analog warmth and digital sheen.

There are a number of analog vs. digital sound tests out there, and even when digital sounds effectively emulated audio to where people couldn't tell the difference in the tone, they almost always could tell the difference in how it FELT to them at a body level. Digital sound spikes tend to strike people as being rather stiff and even plastic-feeling compared to the pulsing, breathing feeling you get from continuous analog waves.

I remember Anthro wrote somewhere on here that the subconscious or High Self object to on/off signal output from some of the IR codes, which led to Anthro creating Holo-Stones. It seems to me that IR and AetherOnePi's Arduino hardware outputs particles while analog radionic boxes and Holo-tech outputs waves.

It could be that the soul perceives the difference and i guess it comes down to personal preference whether a person's High Self prefers wave form or particle form audio. In its crudest form i figure it's kind of like listening to someone talking to you through a fan's blades, that kind of choppy sound you get when you speak into whirling blades can take some getting used to.

I guess it comes down to the practitioner. Everybody has different preferences. Even though he uses and champions the technology on a surface level, perhaps Isuret's soul doesn't connect to the digital output signals the Arduino and similar microcontrollers deliver. We've all been in a situation where something may look good on paper or may check out logically, but when we try it out something just doesn't feel right. You have to factor intuition into your workings

It may help him to test the different feels he gets from natural vs electrical power sources by testing out tower busters vs working radionic circuits to see which of them speak to him more.

Again, it may also help Isuret to track down different radionic machines with different amplifiers (analog tubes, early transistors, integrated controllers) and compare how they feel to his Arduino microcontroller units. If he notes any differences, he may find he prefers working with different amp types.

Finally, in my research, i found that the circuit in T. Galen Hieronymus' 1949 radionic patent was based around using a light prism as a carrier wave for his signal. Almost none of the modern radionic boxes do this. Hieronymus used his prism as a way of introducing light as a carrier wave. It was clumsy but it worked. The technology has had to play catch-up and is finally emerging in a useful way. Soon it may be possible to build optoelectronic radionic boxes where the information signal is carried by fiber optic cables. This will allow a FAR higher information transfer fidelity than either analog or digital signals are capable of, and the good thing about fibre optic information is that it has no headroom - light amplification doesn't have headroom or allow for distortion to take place, so there is no signal degradation.

There's a lot left to be done with these machines, the technology is still catching up to the potential

As far as the current level of technology, Isuret may interpret the machines speaking to him differently and it may take him using multiple machine types to find the ones that speak to him best. Everybody has to find out what it means to them to use radionics properly. Food for thought