|
Post by nathanmyersc on Apr 2, 2024 4:28:33 GMT
When i have several threads running in the background repeating the intentiton whilst creating the file. It seems to be much stronger. I gave this patient a file composed of ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT repeated 1000 times. at 532 hz he said that it gave him the best sleep he had in a long time. Apparently he has some horrible disease and the simple audio fle i created managed to give him real results. pretty proud of that. But one should have intention processor threads running the intention to 1gb then deleting them and repeat until file is converted. Its like whilst file processing intention repeater. makes it more powerful
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 2, 2024 14:06:09 GMT
That's awesome. Do you think we could incorporate stereo somehow? You can put all your awesome intentions you had in that cpp file into a text file and run it there rather than hardcoding them into the code if you want.
Sorry, forgot we can use up to 8 channels. But I think they're all mono.
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 2, 2024 14:10:33 GMT
When i have several threads running in the background repeating the intentiton whilst creating the file. It seems to be much stronger. I gave this patient a file composed of ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT repeated 1000 times. at 532 hz he said that it gave him the best sleep he had in a long time. Apparently he has some horrible disease and the simple audio fle i created managed to give him real results. pretty proud of that. But one should have intention processor threads running the intention to 1gb then deleting them and repeat until file is converted. Its like whilst file processing intention repeater. makes it more powerful 532Hz is an unusual one. I've seen 528Hz and 432Hz. Did you pick this odd one for a reason?
I did ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT too, and it's best I think on 0% smoothing. Did you go with 0% smoothing? And I just use 96000 sampling rate rather than trying to use a multiple of frequency though you can do both.
Yeah, I'll see about doing a Repeater process while writing the WAV. Do you think repeating in memory 1000 times per written sample is a good start? It will slow it down a bit, but it's already so fast.
What intention should be repeated in memory to best affect the intention written to the WAV?
|
|
|
Post by nathanmyersc on Apr 2, 2024 14:24:40 GMT
When i have several threads running in the background repeating the intentiton whilst creating the file. It seems to be much stronger. I gave this patient a file composed of ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT repeated 1000 times. at 532 hz he said that it gave him the best sleep he had in a long time. Apparently he has some horrible disease and the simple audio fle i created managed to give him real results. pretty proud of that. But one should have intention processor threads running the intention to 1gb then deleting them and repeat until file is converted. Its like whilst file processing intention repeater. makes it more powerful 532Hz is an unusual one. I've seen 528Hz and 432Hz. Did you pick this odd one for a reason?
I did ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT too, and it's best I think on 0% smoothing. Did you go with 0% smoothing? And I just use 96000 sampling rate rather than trying to use a multiple of frequency though you can do both.
Yeah, I'll see about doing a Repeater process while writing the WAV. Do you think repeating in memory 1000 times per written sample is a good start? It will slow it down a bit, but it's already so fast.
What intention should be repeated in memory to best affect the intention written to the WAV?
Not sure i just repeat the entire text document over and over again in memory until it hits 1 gb then restart. it seems to have made a powerful enough product that someeone with really bad illness was thanking me and paying for max level patreon. I think that etanercept is just a very powerful drug. and having max threads repeating the intention while you make the file probably helps the file be charged.
|
|
|
Post by nathanmyersc on Apr 2, 2024 14:25:55 GMT
That's awesome. Do you think we could incorporate stereo somehow? You can put all your awesome intentions you had in that cpp file into a text file and run it there rather than hardcoding them into the code if you want.
Sorry, forgot we can use up to 8 channels. But I think they're all mono.
yeah i trid asking chata gpt how to make a stereo track but he never enlightened me.
|
|
|
Post by nathanmyersc on Apr 2, 2024 14:30:49 GMT
When i have several threads running in the background repeating the intentiton whilst creating the file. It seems to be much stronger. I gave this patient a file composed of ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT repeated 1000 times. at 532 hz he said that it gave him the best sleep he had in a long time. Apparently he has some horrible disease and the simple audio fle i created managed to give him real results. pretty proud of that. But one should have intention processor threads running the intention to 1gb then deleting them and repeat until file is converted. Its like whilst file processing intention repeater. makes it more powerful 532Hz is an unusual one. I've seen 528Hz and 432Hz. Did you pick this odd one for a reason?
I did ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT too, and it's best I think on 0% smoothing. Did you go with 0% smoothing? And I just use 96000 sampling rate rather than trying to use a multiple of frequency though you can do both.
Yeah, I'll see about doing a Repeater process while writing the WAV. Do you think repeating in memory 1000 times per written sample is a good start? It will slow it down a bit, but it's already so fast.
What intention should be repeated in memory to best affect the intention written to the WAV?
nah i thought 532 was the good one. i guess it doesnt matter that much.
|
|
|
Post by reden on Apr 2, 2024 14:34:42 GMT
That's awesome. Do you think we could incorporate stereo somehow? You can put all your awesome intentions you had in that cpp file into a text file and run it there rather than hardcoding them into the code if you want.
Sorry, forgot we can use up to 8 channels. But I think they're all mono.
What would be the point of stereo be as opposed to more mono channels?
|
|
|
Post by nathanmyersc on Apr 2, 2024 14:35:59 GMT
That's awesome. Do you think we could incorporate stereo somehow? You can put all your awesome intentions you had in that cpp file into a text file and run it there rather than hardcoding them into the code if you want.
Sorry, forgot we can use up to 8 channels. But I think they're all mono.
What would be the point of stereo be as opposed to more mono channels? To make it come out of both speakers.
|
|
|
Post by reden on Apr 2, 2024 14:54:43 GMT
What would be the point of stereo be as opposed to more mono channels? To make it come out of both speakers. At least on a desktop, if you have a mono track, it will be played out of both speakers. Both will play the same track. Were it stereo, the left would play the left, and the right the right track. Something similar happens for multiple mono tracks. It is even possible to assign left and right to them.
|
|
|
Post by reden on Apr 2, 2024 14:59:33 GMT
532Hz is an unusual one. I've seen 528Hz and 432Hz. Did you pick this odd one for a reason?
I did ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT ETANERCEPT too, and it's best I think on 0% smoothing. Did you go with 0% smoothing? And I just use 96000 sampling rate rather than trying to use a multiple of frequency though you can do both.
Yeah, I'll see about doing a Repeater process while writing the WAV. Do you think repeating in memory 1000 times per written sample is a good start? It will slow it down a bit, but it's already so fast.
What intention should be repeated in memory to best affect the intention written to the WAV?
nah i thought 532 was the good one. i guess it doesnt matter that much. If you used 528 the effects would be better and would have even more, such as The 528 Hz frequency is often referred to as the "love frequency" or the "miracle frequency" in the context of solfeggio frequencies. While the 528 Hz frequency is primarily associated with the Solar Plexus Chakra (Manipura), it is also believed to have a strong connection to the Heart Chakra (Anahata). This is because the 528 Hz frequency is thought to promote feelings of love, compassion, and inner peace, which are associated with the Heart Chakra. So the 528 Hz frequency is believed to have a dual effect, simultaneously balancing and activating both the Solar Plexus Chakra (related to personal power and self-esteem) and the Heart Chakra (related to love, empathy, and connection). This makes it a powerful frequency for emotional and spiritual healing, as it can help integrate the energies of both the personal and the universal love.
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 2, 2024 15:29:48 GMT
Do you think using smoothing of 33.333% has any significance? Or is it better to use 0% smoothing to maintain most of the original if it doesn't sound bad?
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 2, 2024 15:36:48 GMT
That's awesome. Do you think we could incorporate stereo somehow? You can put all your awesome intentions you had in that cpp file into a text file and run it there rather than hardcoding them into the code if you want.
Sorry, forgot we can use up to 8 channels. But I think they're all mono.
What would be the point of stereo be as opposed to more mono channels? Only useful if we want to play something different out of left and right channels.
Is stereo the same as having 2 mono channels? How can we define as left or right in making a WAV?
|
|
|
Post by reden on Apr 2, 2024 15:45:57 GMT
Do you think using smoothing of 33.333% has any significance? Or is it better to use 0% smoothing to maintain most of the original if it doesn't sound bad? You can try both and see which is stronger.
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Apr 2, 2024 15:50:12 GMT
Do you think using smoothing of 33.333% has any significance? Or is it better to use 0% smoothing to maintain most of the original if it doesn't sound bad? You can try both and see which is stronger. 0% smoothing is better if you are ok with the pulses sound, or sounding like data being transferred. That retains more of the original information.
Even that uses a sine wave pattern so it sounds good. I remember you saying that if there's pulses it's no good.
|
|
|
Post by reden on Apr 2, 2024 15:52:41 GMT
What would be the point of stereo be as opposed to more mono channels? Only useful if we want to play something different out of left and right channels.
Is stereo the same as having 2 mono channels? How can we define as left or right in making a WAV?
The difference seems to be that a stereo track has 2 or more channels, which can be different between them, and the ears & brain merge them into one sound. Whereas having 2 mono channels often means they're the same. trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/AudioChannelManipulation to assign as left or right. However, there is no point in doing that as they're the same data. If there's only one single channel, it's played out of all available speakers.
|
|