|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Mar 23, 2024 21:31:57 GMT
I made a very simple Intention Repeater using WebGPT. I also made a Multithreaded one.
For not using hashing, the numbers on the non-multithreaded one are like 1000X less than the Intention Repeater MAX.
I am not sure if the MAX may be misleading in its numbers, but I can't figure out why there is such a difference.
This Simple version may provide a more accurate display of freq (Hz) and iterations.
|
|
|
|
Post by nathanmyersc on Mar 23, 2024 21:44:36 GMT
I made a very simple Intention Repeater using WebGPT. I also made a Multithreaded one.
For not using hashing, the numbers on the non-multithreaded one are like 1000X less than the Intention Repeater MAX.
I am not sure if the MAX may be misleading in its numbers, but I can't figure out why there is such a difference.
This Simple version may provide a more accurate display of freq (Hz) and iterations.
Yeah i had the feeling their was something misleading about maxes output it never matched my own creations always was much higher. i pondered if you did it on purpose as an affirmation or something. |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Mar 23, 2024 21:47:38 GMT
Tell me if the numbers to this Repeater Simple for multi-threaded and regular are similar to the numbers you are getting.
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Mar 23, 2024 23:32:49 GMT
I made a very simple Intention Repeater using WebGPT. I also made a Multithreaded one.
For not using hashing, the numbers on the non-multithreaded one are like 1000X less than the Intention Repeater MAX.
I am not sure if the MAX may be misleading in its numbers, but I can't figure out why there is such a difference.
This Simple version may provide a more accurate display of freq (Hz) and iterations.
Yeah i had the feeling their was something misleading about maxes output it never matched my own creations always was much higher. i pondered if you did it on purpose as an affirmation or something. Simple's repeat rate seems to be half of MAX's. Personally I don't mind as it is still strong and useful for me. AnthroHeart said Simple can be used as an example for developers. |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Mar 23, 2024 23:47:52 GMT
Were you running with hashing?
MAX doesn't use hashing, and it's the only way to get anywhere close to MAX's numbers.
I looked at the code, but couldn't figure out why the difference.
Have you tried the Multithreading one? It's a bit faster.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Mar 23, 2024 23:51:03 GMT
I don't know if the formatting of the number is off for Repeater MAX.
I can probably check the underling number itself before formatting and see.
|
|
|
|
Post by nathanmyersc on Mar 24, 2024 0:24:03 GMT
Heres my version if your interested in comparing. When using 1 gb intention you cannot have the main thread also repeating unless you have a seperate thread for updating the time ecetera. Cause it takes like 1500 ms for it to completely write 1 gb intention. You can set a charged object or person by doign "Nathan Myerscough" is charged by "SOANDSO.txt" I havent made it intelligent to "Nathan Myerscough is charged with INFINITE FORTITUDE or anything like that yet. only charged by files. and it defaults to charging me. Butt you could see it and if you like any part of it add it to your own. i took lots of ideas we came up with.
Attachments:main.cpp (20.09 KB)
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Mar 24, 2024 2:36:31 GMT
Were you running with hashing? MAX doesn't use hashing, and it's the only way to get anywhere close to MAX's numbers. I looked at the code, but couldn't figure out why the difference. Have you tried the Multithreading one? It's a bit faster. No, I took the examples you shared in our private chat |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Mar 24, 2024 5:21:22 GMT
OK, I updated the Intention Repeater Max to v5.8 on my Github
I had (on Line 915): intention_value = intention + PROCESS_STATEMENT;
Instead Of: intention_value = intention_value + PROCESS_STATEMENT;
So it was actually repeating the intention without using intention multiplying, but displaying repetition frequency as if it were.
"I am Love." now repeats at a more accurate 1.610GHz with 1GB of RAM, which includes Intention Multiplying.
It now more accurately matches the Intention Repeater Simple.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Mar 24, 2024 9:21:38 GMT
I have created an Intention Repeater Simple CUDA, and also updated the Intention Repeater Simple. Claude 3 Opus was very helpful. I didn't bother adding CUDA to the Multi-Threaded. CUDA is getting 53PHz vs standard 1.6GHz. Code and Binary here: github.com/tsweet77/intention-repeater-simple>Intention_Repeater_Simple_CUDA.exe Enter your Intention: I am Love. GB RAM to Use [Default 1]: 1 Use Hashing (y/N): n ^C0:00:07] Repeating: (375.809q / 53.687PHz) >Intention_Repeater_Simple.exe Enter your Intention: I am Love. GB RAM to Use [Default 1]: 1 Use Hashing (y/N): n ^C0:00:04] Repeating: (8.053B / 1.610GHz)
I will have to look at it for hashing, because for CUDA, the frequency is the same whether hashing is used or not, which shouldn't be the case.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Mar 24, 2024 10:37:39 GMT
Updated CUDA so now Hashing gives a bigger value than nonhashing, as it should: Enter your Intention: I am Love. GB RAM to Use [Default 1]: 1 Use Hashing (y/N): y ^C0:00:17] Repeating: (537.972S / 31.673YHz)
I updated the regular Intention_Repeater_Simple.cpp and .exe files as well. Using more accurate timing instead of benchmarks.
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Mar 24, 2024 14:53:57 GMT
I get 4.503 PHz on Simple (no multithreading) with and without Hashing for "I am love".
You could merge multithreading into the main file
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Mar 24, 2024 16:19:19 GMT
Ok, I updated the Simple, Simple Multithreaded and Simple CUDA to allow for command-line flags/parameters. github.com/tsweet77/intention-repeater-simpleUse /? or --help after the .exe for list of flags.
I'm keeping the Multithreading one separate to keep the files simpler, and to help others learn a bit easier.
Should I add in LIBZ compression option? |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Mar 24, 2024 18:57:35 GMT
I created a Google Colab file using my new Intention Repeater Simple CUDA. It has hashing where the old colab workbook didn't.
I also made a minor update to the CUDA files, so you can update if you wish.
"I am Love." with 5GB RAM runs at 453YHz.
|
|
|
|
Post by nathanmyersc on Mar 24, 2024 19:48:27 GMT
Ok, I updated the Simple, Simple Multithreaded and Simple CUDA to allow for command-line flags/parameters. github.com/tsweet77/intention-repeater-simpleUse /? or --help after the .exe for list of flags.
I'm keeping the Multithreading one separate to keep the files simpler, and to help others learn a bit easier.
Should I add in LIBZ compression option? No idea its just as experimental as hashing is. i have no clue whether it conveys the intent in a smaller package same as hashing. its hard to know these things except to test them. |
|
