|
|
Post by reden on Jul 7, 2022 15:37:50 GMT
You could combine Repeater Images and WAV. I wonder if WAVs support art covers? If so, the Repeater Image could be added as the art cover for the track, further infusing it with energy. No. But FLACs, which are lossless but compressed files, do. |
|
|
|
Post by reden on Jul 7, 2022 15:39:41 GMT
I can't believe you already have over 350 posts. Congratulations.
|
|
|
|
Post by sound on Jul 7, 2022 15:40:10 GMT
I wonder if WAVs support art covers? If so, the Repeater Image could be added as the art cover for the track, further infusing it with energy. No. But FLACs, which are lossless but compressed files, do. Ok. So maybe a future version could convert it into FLAC, charge a Repeater Image and attach it. For now, I think it's overkill. But an interesting thing to consider in the future! |
|
|
|
Post by sound on Jul 7, 2022 15:41:14 GMT
I can't believe you already have over 350 posts. Congratulations. Thank you! |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Jul 8, 2022 11:53:59 GMT
With your WAV Creator 2.0, how do you combine the WAV file when it's played with the Holo-Link?
Have you tested to make sure it works embedding NEST-100 into the WAV at 0 volume?
That's somewhat of an arbitrary intention. It's best to encode the actual intention into the WAV file.
I could be wrong though, but it's an observation.
I don't really feel anything from the intention "ascension.wav is charged with NEST-100.TXT".
|
|
|
|
Post by sound on Jul 8, 2022 15:33:15 GMT
With your WAV Creator 2.0, how do you combine the WAV file when it's played with the Holo-Link?
Have you tested to make sure it works embedding NEST-100 into the WAV at 0 volume?
That's somewhat of an arbitrary intention. It's best to encode the actual intention into the WAV file.
I could be wrong though, but it's an observation.
I don't really feel anything from the intention "ascension.wav is charged with NEST-100.TXT".
I've had some people tell me they are very strong, so it was not completely arbitrary (at least not more so than many other experiments conducted here in my opinion). Personally I am not sensitive enough to determine the effectiveness of this method, but I did put "experimental" in the GitHub description to clarify that it is not fully tested. My reasoning was that the NEST-100.TXT file would automatically contain the energy of all its nested files, the same rationale by which we use the file name in the Repeater; to me it makes perfect sense but maybe it is too far-fetched to work, I really don't know. I guess it needs more testing. Thanks for your remarks. |
|
|
|
Post by reden on Jul 9, 2022 6:12:39 GMT
He didn't create bubble tech, but is a big proponent of it. Who created Bubbles then? |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Jul 9, 2022 10:10:27 GMT
He didn't create bubble tech, but is a big proponent of it. Who created Bubbles then? I believe it was Bill Tiesing. |
|
|
|
Post by reden on Jul 9, 2022 17:40:27 GMT
Who created Bubbles then? I believe it was Bill Tiesing. I wonder if he wants dreamtime, like Emery. |
|
|
|
Post by reden on Jul 10, 2022 3:02:55 GMT
When the script (at least v1) says "set /p id="Enter output file name (.wav): "", it should append .wav to the name.
Because otherwise, it infuses the file's name, without the extension.
|
|
|
|
Post by sound on Jul 10, 2022 12:47:25 GMT
When the script (at least v1) says "set /p id="Enter output file name (.wav): "", it should append .wav to the name. Because otherwise, it infuses the file's name, without the extension. The intention is that the user enters .wav at the end  |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Jul 10, 2022 16:48:19 GMT
When the script (at least v1) says "set /p id="Enter output file name (.wav): "", it should append .wav to the name. Because otherwise, it infuses the file's name, without the extension. The intention is that the user enters .wav at the end I'm not sure if in a batch file you can check for if user entered .wav at the end and then add it if they didn't. |
|
|
|
Post by reden on Jul 10, 2022 16:57:16 GMT
The intention is that the user enters .wav at the end I'm not sure if in a batch file you can check for if user entered .wav at the end and then add it if they didn't. I think it's possible at least in bash and unix shells. But if not, then you can put "%id%.wav" in the script, or similar. |
|
|
|
Post by sound on Jul 10, 2022 19:14:01 GMT
Might as well type .wav then.
If the user types .wav, it would become .wav.wav
Minor issue, I will probably leave it as it is but try to clarify that the extension must be added.
But anyway, if no extension is put I am not sure a file is even created (it will charge "air", due to no output from WAV Converter).
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Jul 10, 2022 19:15:26 GMT
Might as well type .wav then. If the user types .wav, it would become .wav.wav Minor issue, I will probably leave it as it is but try to clarify that the extension must be added. But anyway, if no extension is put I am not sure a file is even created (it will charge "air", due to no output from WAV Converter). The file is created, but say if the filename is "strength" it would become "strength is charged..." Without .wav. I forgot to explain: the WAV Repeater ensures the file always has .wav. |
|
