|
|
Post by reden on Jun 29, 2022 21:23:56 GMT
Or can I do "<file> and all remote copies of <file> are permanently charged" ? It will work. Not sure if energy will thin out. |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Jun 29, 2022 21:28:19 GMT
I can share it with Google Drive too, with a link. I do not like YouTube's compression, and its lack of a native download feature. Hmm . . . I am still thinking about how to go about this. I guess I could use a program that creates an automatic backup of the local file to a cloud server every hour. The Repeater runs towards it 24/7. What do you think? It might be the best way forward. Maybe you can use like Vimeo if they offer download, or offer it through your Patreon. |
|
|
|
Post by sound on Jun 29, 2022 21:30:17 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Jun 29, 2022 21:31:27 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by sound on Jun 29, 2022 21:40:35 GMT
It is done: github.com/tradecool/sound-repeater-work/raw/main/Male_Life_Chamber.oggThe audio was extracted from an MKV screen recording which had also been charged with the Repeater for about an hour. The link is now being targeted by the Repeater to further charge it. Feel free to split this into a separate thread if you consider that better.
The Repeater will continue to charge the link to the file 24/7 per my capacity.
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Jun 29, 2022 21:46:32 GMT
It is done: github.com/tradecool/sound-repeater-work/blob/main/Male_Life_Chamber.oggThe audio was extracted from an MKV screen recording which had also been charged with the Repeater for about an hour. The link is now being targeted by the Repeater to further charge it. Feel free to split this into a separate thread if you consider that better.
The Repeater will continue to charge the link to the file 24/7 per my capacity.
You could rent a VPS and run it on there. Google provides one free 1 GB ram vps forever with their cloud trial. It's slow but it's forever. Oracle provides x86 (common computer) VPS and ARM (more like a phone, but can be surprisingly strong) VPS. The latter have like 8 cores and 24 GB RAM. But they will call you to ascertain your purpose for using Oracle's free forever tier, so be ready to reply. |
|
|
|
Post by sound on Jun 29, 2022 22:06:13 GMT
Thanks reden , good ideas. For now I do not mind having my laptop on 24/7. P.S. Anyone can live-stream the file in VLC, by going to Media > Open Network Stream > and pasting github.com/tradecool/sound-repeater-work/raw/main/Male_Life_Chamber.ogg. This way, you will always get the strongest version.
This feels stronger than downloading the file. This should create a direct ONLINE connection with the Repeater, along with transmitting the 'offline' energy field!
PS. I am pretty sure VLC reloads the file as it streams; it does not make a copy to the memory which it repeats. This can be confirmed by a significant delay in the beginning of each loop as it 'loads' from the server.
|
|
|
|
Post by sound on Jun 29, 2022 22:17:45 GMT
Note the edits that were made to my last post.
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Jun 29, 2022 22:25:19 GMT
Thanks reden , good ideas. For now I do not mind having my laptop on 24/7. P.S. Anyone can live-stream the file in VLC, by going to Media > Open Network Stream > and pasting github.com/tradecool/sound-repeater-work/raw/main/Male_Life_Chamber.ogg. This way, you will always get the strongest version.
This feels stronger than downloading the file. This should create a direct ONLINE connection with the Repeater, along with transmitting the 'offline' energy field!
PS. I am pretty sure VLC reloads the file as it streams; it does not make a copy to the memory which it repeats. This can be confirmed by a significant delay in the beginning of each loop as it 'loads' from the server.
Both are online, so to say. Live. The energy field is dynamic. |
|
|
|
Post by sound on Jun 29, 2022 22:28:10 GMT
I understand.
Still, streaming it feels stronger, not sure why . . . Maybe because every loop retrieves the strongest version from the server (having been charged longer by the Repeater).
|
|
|
|
Post by sound on Jun 29, 2022 22:31:45 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by sound on Jun 29, 2022 22:47:00 GMT
To me, there is a big difference streaming and listening to an offline copy. I don't know why this might be.
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Jun 29, 2022 22:51:13 GMT
To me, there is a big difference streaming and listening to an offline copy. I don't know why this might be. No one knows either. |
|
|
|
Post by sound on Jun 29, 2022 22:53:33 GMT
To me, there is a big difference streaming and listening to an offline copy. I don't know why this might be. No one knows either. What I could think of is, maybe because the device retrieves the data packets via Wi-Fi and thus charges the electromagnetic field of the Wi-Fi adapter also (or of the router)?
Anyway . . . I will not draw any conclusions until anyone else has confirmed or denied my finding.
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Jun 29, 2022 23:00:29 GMT
What I could think of is, maybe because the device retrieves the data packets via Wi-Fi and thus charges the electromagnetic field of the Wi-Fi adapter also (or of the router)?
Anyway . . . I will not draw any conclusions until anyone else has confirmed or denied my finding.
I meant it in the context of recorded sessions in general. |
|
