|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Jun 2, 2022 17:02:53 GMT
The audios are just rain or ocean waves for those. I am setting it to 12GB RAM, maybe thats it? I think it's just AnthroHeart balancing himself. Yeah, I have internal angst I am working on. Balancing a lot of spiritual gravity. When it's off, I feel anxious.
|
|
|
|
Post by reden on Jun 2, 2022 17:10:57 GMT
Yeah I think there is a lot of potential here that hasn't been explored. And maybe more people will discover the intention repeater. Would be interested to hear what you think of some of the other ones  I reference the Octave Tech and Anthro Black Hole when Im using the Holo-Link for my personal intentions. I do 33sec on, restfor 66. Ive tried referencing all 3 in the intention repeater, not sure if its making a difference. It has always been said that one shouldn't Repeat the Holo-Stones because one gets bad or odd feelings from them, and instead to use the Holo-Link interface. My theory always was that the Repeater's energy is a continous flicker, while the Holo-Stones and Anthro Black Hole is a constant beam. The addition of Anthro Black Hole in my Intention dimmed the odd wrongness effects from running the Holo-Stones "raw", but not fully. But I didn't feel as happy as with just Resonance Field and Anthro Black Holes. So the Holo-Stones being called "raw" might still cause "interference". Continue using the Holo-Link. If you want, you can add "and Infinite Source" for even greater energy. AnthroHeart said of "I am happy with Anthro Black Hole and Resonance Field and the Holo-Stones", "Yes it seems that feels pretty good." So it might work well. But it might be that you have to put Anthro Black Hole first too. |
|
|
|
Post by reden on Jun 2, 2022 17:15:12 GMT
Perhaps one way of improving the repeater could be to incorporate the Octave Tech and/or anthro black hole energies. Like a toggle or something you can set by inputting a command, that way we don't have to type it every time. Could be for the next update? Don't know anything about coding so not sure if its doable or how difficult it is. It could be added to the Process Statement, an intention coded into the executable itself that gets added into every one of yours. Nowadays it's empty. In semi-older versions it was " INTEGRATE/REGULATE/OM" about that. It could be " WITH RESONANCE FIELD, ANTHRO BLACK HOLE". |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Jun 2, 2022 17:16:57 GMT
I don't want to force people to use the Anthro Black hole if they don't want to.
|
|
|
|
Post by noizy1234 on Jun 2, 2022 17:30:50 GMT
Perhaps one way of improving the repeater could be to incorporate the Octave Tech and/or anthro black hole energies. Like a toggle or something you can set by inputting a command, that way we don't have to type it every time. Could be for the next update? Don't know anything about coding so not sure if its doable or how difficult it is. It's not really a feature that would be used that much. It would require creating a flag (like --imem for memory).
My other developer that helped make CUDA said not to have a lot of flags in a program.
I haven't felt too much of a difference using Anthro Black Hole or not when running repeater. Though I am using it now in my intention.
I see. I actually notice a pretty big difference. |
|
|
|
Post by noizy1234 on Jun 2, 2022 17:32:48 GMT
I don't want to force people to use the Anthro Black hole if they don't want to. Yeah I would agree with this |
|
|
|
Post by noizy1234 on Jun 2, 2022 17:35:50 GMT
Perhaps one way of improving the repeater could be to incorporate the Octave Tech and/or anthro black hole energies. Like a toggle or something you can set by inputting a command, that way we don't have to type it every time. Could be for the next update? Don't know anything about coding so not sure if its doable or how difficult it is. It could be added to the Process Statement, an intention coded into the executable itself that gets added into every one of yours. Nowadays it's empty. In semi-older versions it was " INTEGRATE/REGULATE/OM" about that. It could be " WITH RESONANCE FIELD, ANTHRO BLACK HOLE". With a bit of research I might be able to do this myself and compile my own version that includes that in the process statement. Shouldn't be too difficult to do right? |
|
|
|
Post by reden on Jun 2, 2022 17:40:08 GMT
It could be added to the Process Statement, an intention coded into the executable itself that gets added into every one of yours. Nowadays it's empty. In semi-older versions it was " INTEGRATE/REGULATE/OM" about that. It could be " WITH RESONANCE FIELD, ANTHRO BLACK HOLE". With a bit of research I might be able to do this myself and compile my own version that includes that in the process statement. Shouldn't be too difficult to do right? Not at all. |
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart on Jun 2, 2022 17:44:21 GMT
It could be added to the Process Statement, an intention coded into the executable itself that gets added into every one of yours. Nowadays it's empty. In semi-older versions it was " INTEGRATE/REGULATE/OM" about that. It could be " WITH RESONANCE FIELD, ANTHRO BLACK HOLE". With a bit of research I might be able to do this myself and compile my own version that includes that in the process statement. Shouldn't be too difficult to do right? It would depend on if you want to use Anthro Black Hole once at the end, or with each repetition in the intention multiplying.
Your intention is multiplied before the Repeater functionality works. |
|
|
|
Post by noizy1234 on Jun 2, 2022 17:53:31 GMT
With a bit of research I might be able to do this myself and compile my own version that includes that in the process statement. Shouldn't be too difficult to do right? It would depend on if you want to use Anthro Black Hole once at the end, or with each repetition in the intention multiplying.
Your intention is multiplied before the Repeater functionality works. Ohhh I thought it would get multiplied the same way. Ill just keep doing it this way I guess. |
|
|
|
Post by reden on Jun 2, 2022 19:10:13 GMT
Do you regard that a Chamber works better than not being one?
|
|
|
|
Post by noizy1234 on Jun 2, 2022 19:38:16 GMT
Do you regard that a Chamber works better than not being one? Sorry, I dont get your question? Are you asking if I think its better to say "I am in (blank) chamber..." than to just say the intention? If thats your question then no, Im not sure. I just thought using a chamber might be easier to accept by subconscious. But I am using both ways and experimenting. Wish we had more people interested, it would be easier to find out what works best with a lot of people involved. |
|
|
|
Post by noizy1234 on Jun 2, 2022 19:43:20 GMT
Do you regard that a Chamber works better than not being one? I was also thinking it might encompass a more wide range than just stated intention. For example I made one video for chakra development chamber. Instead of saying My chakras are growing or whatever, I set the intention to being in the most optimal chakra development chamber. The chamber would include (at least how i was thinking through it) chakra development, balancing, clearing , etc; it would all be part of it. But if i just say chakra development, it might limit the scope of what is intended. Idk if that made sense to you lol |
|
|
|
Post by reden on Jun 2, 2022 20:59:48 GMT
Do you regard that a Chamber works better than not being one? I was also thinking it might encompass a more wide range than just stated intention. For example I made one video for chakra development chamber. Instead of saying My chakras are growing or whatever, I set the intention to being in the most optimal chakra development chamber. The chamber would include (at least how i was thinking through it) chakra development, balancing, clearing , etc; it would all be part of it. But if i just say chakra development, it might limit the scope of what is intended. Idk if that made sense to you lol I understand your perspective. It might be true. The Repeater has an intelligence which expresses, among other forms, as you have described. But the intention for that could be "Improve my chakras" or something. |
|
pompom
Junior Member
Posts: 68
|
Post by pompom on Jun 2, 2022 21:34:23 GMT
Thanks I've been wanting something like this for a while since I can't use the repeater on my chromebook. Can't wait to use these when I get off work (especially your money one lol). Thanks a bunch, I've already subscribed!
|
|
